Open Networked Learning Course (ONL212), Topic 2: Open Learning and the Growing of Plants   

I always thought of ‘open learning’ and ‘open access’ as making educational resources freely available to all online and was thrown completely off balance after hearing Maha Bali speak at our ONL webinar about OER as ‘Self’. Maha Bali and Susan Koseoglu argue for a broader understanding of open educational resource (OER) that goes beyond “educational materials and tools” to include the “processes and products of open scholarship”. They also further argue for an understanding of OER as ‘Self’ or identity, for “openness as a worldview” or “openness as a state of being in the world – and not necessarily in a digitized world”. They highlight four possible ways of engaging with the world as an OER: 1. Being an “editable person” who is willing to listen and change; 2. Undertaking “narrated practice” or being transparent about our processes; 3. Embracing vulnerability which would include the sharing of incomplete ideas and allowing others see us as “who we are” and our “authentic identities”; 4. Participating in knowledge negotiation (e.g. open conversations about developing ideas) instead of only “polished knowledge sharing” (e.g. journal publications).

This idea of OER as identity very interesting and timely as I have been thinking a lot about the role of an academic lately—as educator, writer, and learner. Our ONL discussion webinar with Kiruthika Ragupathi and Alastair Creelman further explored how such openness would influence how we relate to students, other academics, and other institutions. As an ‘open’ academic, one could share materials, feedback, and ideas with other educators in one’s own institution as well as those in other institutions. As an ‘open’ educator, one could adapt the course syllabus in response to students’ needs and interests, listening and observing more than speaking. One could prioritize inculcating ‘openness’ in students and creating a safe classroom environment that encourages the sharing of imperfect thoughts and works in progress. As an ‘open’ writer, one’s writing could speak to not just academics within one’s discipline but also researchers in other fields and the public. One could engage with issues of public interest, speak and write boldly with courage and conviction. As an ‘open’ learner, one could take charge of one’s continuous learning and accept the struggle and time needed to learn something new. It is alright to be not ‘good’ at something. This is of course difficult in a culture that emphasises productivity and achievement over effort and process. As Bali and Koseoglu recognise, power differentials also impact one’s ability to be ‘open’. This is very true. To what extent is one able to adopt an identity and practice that deviates from the scripts and goals set by those in power?  

In our PBL group discussions about openness, one theme that emerged was the importance of knowing how to locate and evaluate the accuracy and quality of information in the online sea of information. ‘How to know’ skills are more important than ‘what to know’. Our group facilitator (thanks Miriam!) pointed us to a fascinating article by Seymour Papert on the art of learning. Papert observes that ‘how to know’ or “the art of learning” is currently an “academic orphan” in our current education system and culture. He highlights mainstream education practices and assumptions that neglect or undermine effective learning, such as the insistence on speedy task completion though deep learning requires time and “thinking about the problem”. His article discusses several ‘how to know’ conditions (e.g. having discussions, real needs vs abstract problems, finding interconnections, dividing up the problem to solve it in parts). It also made me think about failing as an important part of the learning process, about the need to learn how to deal with the psychological fall-out of failure and get back up again. We don’t recognise this enough as educators and learners. Instead, most continue to emphasise ‘excellence’ (e.g. grades, rankings) and ‘productivity’.

In his article, Papert describes his foray into ‘flower literacy’ (recognising and naming of flowers). At first, he struggled to remember the complicated flower names and match them to the flowers, but with time, he gradually found himself gaining mastery over ‘flower literacy’ through conversations with others and by drawing interconnections with other areas he found interesting. This made me think about my own attempts at plant care over the past five years. At the start, I was puzzled at why all my plants kept dying despite my constant and even frantic attention. I was a helicopter plant parent, rushing around our apartment placing pots with withering plants in different spots in desperate attempts to revive them, under the fan, first in the light, and then away from the light. Slowly, I started sharing about my failures and getting tips from friends with green fingers, home-based plant sellers, and plant shop employees. I accepted that some casualties were necessary. I read up more about plant care and was especially interested in plants safe for pets, connecting plant care to care of our little aging chihuahua Tiny who continues to have a habit of chewing on plants. After months of moving pots around our apartment, and after observing where our new neighbours placed their flourishing garden on their balcony, I finally found a spot on ours that was just right. My plant care journey has taken quite a bit of time and research, many conversations, and more than some tears.

Today, the little green corner on our balcony is a source of much joy for me (and our dog Tiny). It is also a reminder of the ups-and-downs of my learning journey.

Tiny enjoying the sunshine in the green corner of our balcony, October 2021.

8 thoughts on “Open Networked Learning Course (ONL212), Topic 2: Open Learning and the Growing of Plants   ”

  1. Very interesting to “hear” your thoughts on this topic and especially how Maha Bali’s webinar affected you. Your summary opened up for more reflection about the “self” for me. I will now look into what Papert have to say. Thanks for sharing

    Liked by 1 person

  2. You write about many important and thought-provoking ideas here. I especially found the sentence “One could prioritize inculcating ‘openness’ in students and creating a safe classroom environment that encourages the sharing of imperfect thoughts and works in progress” interesting, as I am convinced that the idea of not being able to fail is severely detrimental to learning and progression in any field. This applies, I my mind, to schooling of children as well as higher education. I am constantly struggling with ideas and methods to help the participants of my courses feel that they are allowed to fail and that this is a part of the learning process. Also, how you describe how this idea collides with the idea that everyone has to be productive and efficient is true and important. I get the notion that we are creating a society where everything that is not productive and efficient has no place, and therefore many individuals feel that they have no place in it. This I find very concerning, as I cannot see how we could shape a future if many people feel that they are not part of the whole. So many other things that you wrote sparked thoughts in my mind (for example concerning authority and the courage to think differently), and I thank you for that. /Sara

    Liked by 1 person

    1. Thank you for these thought-provoking observations, which I have read several times. The inclusion point is so important and more indeed needs to be done.

      Like

  3. I like the analogy of your plants and your analysis of the nuances of openness in education are very insightful. It is a very complex area and there are no easy solutions. But as you show I believe that you learn more form sharing and engaging in discussion than being closed and restricted.

    Liked by 1 person

  4. Thank you for sharing your thoughts about the art of learning. I fully agree with you that deep learning requires time and allowing failure is an important part of learning. These ideas seem to be so obvious. However, during the teaching and the learning process, very often we actually forgot their effects on the learning process for different reasons. We might not give enough time for activating the learning when planning the teaching or during the contact teaching because of the limitation of the time. In this sense, the OER provides the opportunities for the learners to activate deep learnings by retaining, reusing, remixing, redistributing, and revising the resources. The original article you have shared on the art of the learning is also interesting. In the learning process, understanding the concept and creating the links are highly important. /Wei

    Liked by 1 person

    1. Thank you for your observation. Yes, time seems so crucial. I am always trying to find ways to better guard and use time more meaningfully.

      Like

  5. Thank you for an enlightening reflection and metaphor. The critique on academic teaching/learning traditions caught my eye. Since I know you are on Twitter, maybe you should check out #ungrading (if not already). There seem to be a growing critique on why and what we measure in education. I realise I need to prioritise my Papert reading… It lines up with Maton (Knowledge & Knowers) I currently read. Thanks for reminding me of Paperts contribution!

    Liked by 1 person

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: